What little I know about Leadership…

This is all I know about leadership

1.) Leadership has a sense of gravity to it. If you think of Leadership as an element, think of it as one of the denser elements like Tungsten or Gold (or Osmium!). If placed at the top of an organization leadership will flow downward throughout the company. If it’s stuck at the base, or somewhere in the middle, the odds of getting this element to the top of the organization is going to take massive amounts of effort.

2.) Leadership can’t be delegated, like a role or new job assignment.

3.) If there’s a lack of Leadership people will try to fill that void as best they can, and if they can’t they’ll leave for somewhere else where Leadership exists.

4.) Leaders generally have a lot tough choices but most of the time they’re making a lot of boring choices.

5.) Leadership is based in trust, clarity of purpose, discipline and imagination (sometimes humor)

6.) Leadership is essential to running anything for any duration of time.

7.) Leadership is a lonely trade and the best leaders in history were very lonely people. Ironically, they were also very empathetic to people around them.

8.) Leaders will be criticized no matter what course of action they take.

9.) Leadership is encouraged in sports and business, and rarely in theater, writing, or music. No wonder the Arts suffer systemic problems with programs, particularly in funding.

10.) There is no unified plan to raise, train, and prepare tomorrow’s Leaders in America. I wonder if that’s the marketplace working at its finest or if we’re screwed.

 

Tools of the trade for anyone trying to make friends and influence people....

Are we lucky?

I had a great conversation with a fellow competitor the other day. Yes, competitors from EVERY industry talk to each other. In the digital dev world, today’s competitor might be tomorrow’s partner, depending on the project.  He and I were talking about how much work there was, how our companies were just expanding, and how successful we were in our business.

And then he said, “man, we sure were lucky.”

Working 18+ hours a day for years…managing triple % year-of-year growth…coordinating between several offices…Look, I worked my a$$ off. That’s my point. I worked for this success/failure/whatever it’s this company is and going to be. I earned it. I’m proud of it. This wasn’t easy – stop saying we’re lucky.

And on and on I ranted at my fellow competitor.

To which, HE replied….

“It’s digital development in a tech-boom. You don’t have to be good – you have to be present. EVERYONE wants what we’re doing. It’s too hard to figure out if we’re actually good at our trades, because there’s so much demand and no one can really tell the difference between the good or the bad. Anyone out of college can land a cushy gig at the next big-startup… We’re lucky because we’re at least proficient at our trades, and we’re in the middle of a virtual gold-rush. Nothing wrong with that.”

And I have to admit, he’s kind of right. If I took an honest look at the business landscape…we really are lucky. I don’t have to do cold-calls for business. I don’t have to manage a company in a down-industry. If I compare myself to someone in construction or print, I’m not dealing with the challenges those industries face – massive layoffs, diminishing revenue models, ossified command structures, etc. But I have other ones – this industry is really competitive. I need to know how to retain, train, and attract highly-sought and skilled talent; I need to know how to manage growth (invest the profits, or share in the spoils?); and i need to have an ever-changing plan for what is the goal for the next 3-5 year , etc. In those areas, I feel confident that I’m doing a competent job, compared to my competitors. I feel like luck helped, but no one’s luck sustains for years.

I do believe growing a business, even a start-up, is not a crap-shoot. Lotto winners are lucky. I would never say winning the lottery is a good long-term strategy.

 

although if I DID win the lottery, I'd definitely do what this guy did. Numberz4life!

I love my clients

I really, really love my clients at the company. I mean, in the past I’ve worked at companies where it’s usually an  “us vs them” mentality – management vs employees, company vs clients, you vs all. But that’s not how I feel these days about my clients. For whatever reason, it doesn’t matter what industry they’re in (from food conglomerates to digital media studios), what types of project’s they’re working on (mobile, social, web, design, whatever…) , or what state of their company (start-up vs established and all greys inbetween).

I don’t know how we got lucky, but I think it might have to do that we a.) do good work and b.) like attracts like. If you’re good people, good people want to work with you.

If anyone reading has any thoughts on what makes good clients go to good people, feel free to comment. I’d love to hear from anyone else on their thoughts. Is D&T just lucky?

 

all D&T clients - you're Da Bes

Keep Calm and DOM & TOM

When you’re dealing with the day-to-day crises, it’s hard to figure out if there’s a fundamental problem with the company, or if this is the rocky process of a high-growth company. My company’s grown 300% in the last year (doesn’t that sound WONDERFUL?!) alone. This year we’re trending towards another 100%, by some metrics. It’s still an incredible ride. But with more people, and more money, the problems that arise are not ones that really occurred in the past. In the early days, when things sucked (and yes, I have no hopes of ever going back to the “good ol’ days” in a startup. “Good ol’ days” are the most terrifying times in any startup’s time…) people’s morale was steady because of a combo bunker-mentality and new-to-the-company. Now striding into year #3, I’m noticing that there’s a lot of matters that are putting more emotional weight on team-mates shoulders than ever before.

Here’s a few pain-points I’ve noticed lately.

Recognition of work

The good, deranged people in the company took a risk and joined in your delusional madness. They probably made your company succeed. They want/need to be recognized for that. It’s great celebrate “wins” but it  needs to be more specific with each person, not just the company.

Creating a Corporate hierarchy

A pool of friends/colleagues are pulling together, and to a certain extent in a start-up’s lifecycle, the Org chart is relatively flat. What happens when you take this great, kinetic team and start select a choice few to oversee the work of the others? Or worse – bring in outside resources to lead them? This is a difficult tango and one that takes enormous planning.

Say in the company

People are the company, the company is the not people. People create the culture and spread that culture. Startup founders should be prepared to make sure they’re open/ready for people to have increasing say in “their” company. It’s not the founders’ company anymore, at least it’s not JUST the founders….it’s everyone in the company.

Sharing in the rewards

If we win, we win together. If we lose, we lose together. If we make money…

At the end of the day, whether you’re a founder or a team-mate in a startup, and the start-up is doing well but it’s rocky for you, I recommend patience. Success in the early years is hard to nurture and incredibly fragile. Just because you’ve already tolerated a road of mistakes does not mean you’ve “earned” that you/your team-mates/your company stop making mistakes. Whatever is your position, I fervently urge to Keep Calm.

 

The Blame’s on Me (the Blame’s on You)

People in positions of power are afflicted with a severe problem: they don’t get yelled at often enough. Very rarely will they hear how they’re failing; how they can do better; or anything how their choices impact negatively/positively.

We as leaders need to be empathetic, willing and eager to hear what our colleagues have to say.

We as colleagues and coworkers need to be confident to provide direct, constructive criticism.

I err on the side that “the blame’s on me” whenever there is an internal issue, colleague matter, or generally bad news.

Here’s multi-billionaire entrepreneur Ben Horowitz’ assessment on messing up:

Even if you know what you are doing, things go wrong. Things go wrong, because building a multi-faceted human organization to compete and win in a dynamic, highly competitive market turns out to be really hard. If CEOs were graded on a curve, the mean on the test would be 22 out of a 100. This kind of mean can be psychologically challenging for a straight A student. It is particularly challenging, because nobody tells you that the mean is 22.

When people in my company would complain about something or other being broken such as the expense reporting process, I would joke that it was all my fault. The joke was funny, because it wasn’t really a joke. Every problem in the company was indeed my fault. As the founding CEO, every hire and every decision that the company ever made happened under my direction. Unlike a hired gun that comes in and blames all of the problems on the prior regime, there was literally nobody for me to blame. 

I’m not a CEO but I am a CoFounder of the company. Ben makes it hit home in his assessment of the challenges Founders/CEOs get every single day. It’s a great article and definitely worth reading.

I’m going to make a “call to action” for everyone out there – figure out one major problem in your career, figure out the various stakeholders and their stances, and plot out a plan to resolve. I know most people are not CEOs or Founders, but  you can be the “Founder” of your career.

Ultimately, the blame’s on me. It’s also on us. It’ll only get better when we work to make it better, and recognize we need each other to make it better.

The mantra is "Do Good, Be Good" not "Do Average, Blame Others"

 

 

It’s time to Party

We’re planning a few parties at D&T.

And there’s a good reason: every so often you have to celebrate your wins. I think Steve Jobs said that (one of the few quotes I’ll use from the man…)

It take a lot of energy to win anything. So many companies that are scrappy just keep their head down and rack up victory after victory, never taking the time to stop and reflect. Working in that environment will burn out the good people at your company.

So I encourage to have parties, do cocktails, and generally recognize people’s efforts as much and as frequently as possible (particularly when those efforts aren’t obviously tangible. It’s hard for the HR director to feel like they’re rocking it.)

Parties coming up at DOM & TOM:

  •  Ladies Night out #2
  • Cooper Square House Party (Name pending)
  • Beach Haus Corporate Retreat!

Uh, YES Party Kat is on the list. Party Kat is the REASON there's a Party. Duh....

 

 

 

There are no detours in Life

After graduating college (age 21) I worked the following jobs:

  • Film Projection specialist at a movie theater
  • Television writer at a children’s show
  • Theater producer
  • Art/Gymnastics teacher
  • Bartender
  • Collections agent
  • Administrative assistant

It took me seven (7) career changes to get to what I wanted to do, which I didn’t figure out until I was 26ish. That’s averaging a more than job a year!

Here’s my thought on this: Quitting a job is depressing, irrational, and completely necessary

Fun lessons I learned:

1. ) Film Projectionist  – If you’re doing a great job, no one notices. If you’re messing up you’re the fall-guy. Avoid these jobs like the plague

2.) Television writer – Easily the least-creative job I’ve ever done and after you calculate the number of hours you’ve worked, you’re making less than $5/hour.

3.) Theater Producer – As with most Not-for-Profits, raising money is 85% of the gig, 13% is managing personalities; 2% is producing art.

3.) Art/Gymnastics teacher – I learned almost all my conflict-management skills here. You’d be surprised how reasonable five-year-olds can be, versus their adult counterparts (especially parents)

4.) Bartender – The most boring job that exists. What I thought was a glamour gig for a young 20-something was really menial and stupid. If you have skills don’t do this.

5.) Collections agent  (Revenue Management!)- If you run a small business, get good at collections.  And it takes a lot to do it – cajoling, begging, demanding, threatening, etc.

6.) Administrative Assistant – If you’re sitting in meetings, meeting interesting people, and getting mentored this is great. If you’re running for coffee please quit ASAP.

 

Not-for-profits tend to be poorly run; corporate America has GREAT benefits but uninspiring that I think it’s…..intentionally so; and there are very few people in the any industry that really knows what their doing or how to manage people effectively. Working for corporations is a selfish world, people.  It’s very often a selfish, short-sighted, incompetent world. Which is why I needed to keep quitting – I assumed that “no, no this isn’t how people really work. I’m just in a bad company/place/department/industry. I need to try something else…go where people are competent and like each other.” Grass was never greener.

Now, I don’t consider those gigs as a waste of time. I picked up valuable lessons all throughout.  There are no detours in life – I carried a lot with me at DOM &  TOM. Basically, don’t work with jerks, be respectful and humble enough to assign interesting projects to coworkers, and for the love of God don’t do boring.

At least this counts for school credit....

 

 

No one likes

D&T DAY!

Happy DOM & TOM day!

DOM & TOM day is a company-recognized holiday for everyone at D&T  to take a 3-day weekend in April. Because, April’s AWESOME and everyone should go out and enjoy this springtime

No update for today – hope you celebrate this beautiful day!

 

booyah!

 

 

You don’t need a good reason…

My friend Rich has  a great story to share:

He wanted an 8 pack set of abs, so he started the Paleolithic diet. The End.

Bam – that’s it. That’s his reason. Eat better, live better, for better abs.

I love this story tremendously. See, in the story he feels embarrassed that he’s doing all these great, healthy, life-changing things for what is ostensibly a narcissistic goal of physical aggrandizement. And I say “so what?” So what if the reason is not “good enough” by other people’s standards? The results are still the results. You can get a better reason later – there’s always room for growth. But to start the path of healthy body and mind, sometimes you just need any flimsy reason to kickstart your journey. In fact, I’d bet that the more petty the reason, the easier it is to coax yourself into doing it.

I want to lose 20 lbs so I can get laid more.

I want to finish top of the class so I can coast next year. 

I want to earn enough money so I can check out Barcelona for three months. 

I don’t often hear people say “I want to lose 20 lbs so that I offset the prevalent diabetes that plagues the men in my family when they hit their mid-50s…”  or “I want to earn enough money so that I can volunteer my time for more altruistic causes…” (And yes, it’d be a great thing if I did hear that). Those might be the long-term goals; those might be the real reason why you NEED to struggle, but those reasons may not be what gets you started.

And that’s where I’m going with this article. The reasons you start something may not be the reason why you stick with it, and it may not be the best reason to do anything.

now this is happening:

I shudder to think that anyone imagined how powerful creating the Slinky would be on the world's children...

 

 

Why most advice is contradictory

“Take risks, but keep your overhead low.”

“Crowdsource ideas, but work in stealth mode.”

“Work in an open floor plan to keep communications open but leave your developers alone.”

Is it me or does most business advice feel contradictory?

Here’s my theory:

1.) Specific approaches are valid at specific circumstances in the company.

So perhaps it’s valid to take a risk on a new project, but not take a big risk on a new hire. Fine, I get that.

2.) Advice evolves as the people’s judgement evolves.

So while I was rash and foolish in my youth,  these days my experiences have taught me to be more prudent. Or perhaps my definition of “rash” and “prudent” have evolved, and years from now I’ll look back and say “now I know better…”

I wonder if I’ll ever know “best” – Like, the optimal decision to make for any course of action.

In any case, we see that this matter of contradictory advice, and therefore decision-making, can severely undermind one’s leadership. No one wants to follow a waffler; and no one can really lead without a coherent message. So when a break from a previous stance happens, it’s imperative that the leader realizes that he/she is breaking from the previous course of action and communicates that effectively to their team. Otherwise….it’s just going to look like you have a schizophrenic leader who doesn’t know what he/she is doing or why.

Heads we all get an incentivized pay structure; Tails we get stock options and fixed salaries